Sunday, May 31, 2020
Friday, May 29, 2020
Words Matter
Violence erupted in Minneapolis-St. Paul as protestors
continued demonstrations following the death of George Floyd as a result of a police
officer subduing him with his knee pressed against the neck of Floyd as the man
begged for air
President Trump, who previously called the video of Mr.
Floyd’s death “shocking,” later called the protesters “thugs” on Twitter and
said that “when the looting starts, the shooting starts,” prompting the
social media network to attach a warning to the tweet, saying that it violated
the company’s rules about “glorifying violence.”
The company prevented users from viewing Mr. Trump’s message
without first reading a brief notice describing the rule violation. Twitter
also blocked users from liking or replying to Mr. Trump’s post. But Twitter did
not take the message down, saying it was in the public interest for the
president’s words remain accessible.
This morning, the official White House Twitter account posted
a tweet that copied the words of Mr. Trump’s earlier post. The White House post
was also flagged by Twitter for violating its policies.
Haha Trump.
You cannot side-step around your call
for violence.
The death of Mr. Floyd is no laughing matter. For police
trainers and criminologists, the episode is a textbook case of why many police
departments across the country have sought to outright ban or limit the use of
chokeholds or other neck restraints in recent years: The practices have too
often turned fatal. Department records indicate, however, that the Minneapolis
police have not entirely abandoned the use of neck restraints, even if the
method used by the police officer is no longer part of police training. The
Minneapolis Police Department’s manual states that neck restraints and
chokeholds are basically reserved only for when an officer is caught in a
life-or-death situation. There was no such apparent threat during Mr. Floyd’s
detention.
Saturday, May 23, 2020
A Petulant Child
Ahead of President Donald Trump's trip to a Ford Motor plant
in Ypsilanti on May 21, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel wrote him a
letter outlining the rules for visiting her state: Masks are required.
Trump, who has consistently flouted his own government's
recommendation that face coverings be worn in public settings, wore a mask for
the private portion of his Ford tour but took it off for the public event in
front of cameras, despite the Ford facility's own mask requirement.
Frustrated, Nessel did something that caught the president's attention: She compared him to "a petulant child who refuses to follow the rules" on CNN.
Trump responded by trashing her in a pair of tweets, calling
her the "Wacky Do Nothing Attorney General of Michigan, Dana Nessel"
— to which she responded, in part, that she was "impressed" he knew
her name, a nod to Trump's habit of bashing Governor Whitmer as "that
woman from Michigan" and his attack on Michigan's elections chief, Jocelyn
Benson, as an unnamed "rogue Secretary of State."
"I was infuriated and exasperated, because I know that
for every person who goes into a place of business where they're told to wear a
mask, and they see the president not wearing one, their reaction is going to
be, 'The president of the United States doesn't have to wear one. Why should
I?'" she said Friday of Trump's Ford visit. "This isn't funny, these
are people's lives."
In an interview, she listed all the ways he's made it more
difficult for her and her colleagues to battle the COVID-19 outbreak, such as encouraging
protesters who opposed the governor's lockdown to take to the streets and
threatening to withhold funding over the state's efforts to expand
vote-by-mail.
"I'm tired of having to pretend that something isn't
very wrong with the man that is our president," she said. "I never
thought I'd be in a Twitter war with the president of the United States, but I
never thought we'd have a president of the United States quite like Donald
Trump."
-- NBC News
-- NBC News
Thursday, May 21, 2020
Inspector General
The News-Gazette 05/21/2020
Pompeo has continued to refuse to provide any specific explanation for why he wanted Linick fired, other than to say he wasn’t acting the way the State Department wanted him to. Inspectors general by law are supposed to be independent watchdogs of the agencies they monitor.
Pompeo has continued to refuse to provide any specific explanation for why he wanted Linick fired, other than to say he wasn’t acting the way the State Department wanted him to. Inspectors general by law are supposed to be independent watchdogs of the agencies they monitor.
Tuesday, May 19, 2020
Tuesday, May 12, 2020
Obamagate
Trump accused the former president of committing the “biggest political crime in
American history.”
So
what exact crime is Trump accusing Obama of committing?
The
president himself does not seem to know. “Obamagate,” he ruminated in the
White House rose garden on Monday. “It’s been going on for a long time. It’s
been going on from before I even got elected. And it’s a disgrace that it
happened.”
Asked
by a Washington Post reporter for the second time to name Obama’s exact
offence, Trump replied cryptically: “You know what the crime is. The crime is
very obvious to everybody. All you have to do is read the newspapers, except
yours.”
Clear
as mud, then.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)






